Database-driven, phase 1

Every modality people use against cancer, graded by the evidence behind it.

Diet, repurposed drugs, fields, light, heat, herbs, and the standard of care, on one page, in one format. Not to sell any of them. To show what is actually known, what is plausible, and what is only a story so far.

This is not a cure page and it is not medical advice. Nothing here should delay or replace treatment from a doctor. Several things graded here are used alongside standard care by people who never stopped that care. That distinction is the whole point.

The bias here is toward the truth. A claim with strong evidence gets called strong. A claim with no human evidence gets called that too, even when the mechanism is beautiful and the anecdotes are moving. No dosing instructions are given anywhere on this site.

The rubric

How to read this page

Every entry is graded twice. Mechanism asks whether the biology is real. Human outcome asks whether people who did it measurably did better. A modality can have a proven mechanism and no outcome data; that is not a contradiction, it is the normal state of an untested idea.

Axis 1. Mechanism

  • ESTABLISHEDTextbook biology, reproduced across labs.
  • PLAUSIBLEShown in cells or animals; consistent with known biology.
  • SPECULATIVEProposed, not demonstrated, or contradicts known physiology.

Axis 2. Human outcome evidence

  • ARandomized trials large enough to show survival or response, replicated.
  • BSmall randomized trials, or consistent prospective trials, showing a real outcome signal.
  • CUncontrolled trials or cohorts. Safety and feasibility, not proof of benefit.
  • DCase reports and case series. Anecdote, however many.
  • NONENo human outcome data at all for cancer.

Sources

  • VERIFIEDWe opened the paper and confirmed authors, journal, year, and what it claims.
  • PENDINGNamed from the literature, not yet re-verified by us. Treat as a lead, not a fact.
  • RETRACTEDClaims we checked that turned out not to exist. Listed on purpose.
ModalityMechanismHuman outcomeWhere it stands, in one line
Ketogenic diet ESTABLISHED C, some B Pooled trials show reliable metabolic effect (glucose, insulin, IGF-1) and safety; no RCT has shown survival benefit yet. ERGO2 was feasi...
Carnivore diet PLAUSIBLE NONE Zero published cancer studies of carnivore diet exist.
Glutamine restriction and green tea (EGCG) PLAUSIBLE NONE No human trial has shown green tea, EGCG, or dietary glutamine restriction changes a cancer outcome.
Mebendazole PLAUSIBLE C Multiple phase 1/2a trials always added to chemo; built for dose and safety, not to prove benefit.
Fenbendazole PLAUSIBLE D Poor human bioavailability. Famous case was also on trial immunotherapy so cannot be credited to fenbendazole.
Ivermectin PLAUSIBLE D Only human outcome study is uncontrolled, unblinded, self-reported, and authored by the protocol's advocates.
Tumor treating fields (Optune) ESTABLISHED A (glioblastoma) Phase 3 EF-14 RCT showed survival benefit; FDA approved since 2015. Not shown for other gliomas.
Light: photodynamic therapy ESTABLISHED A/B (specific cancers) Approved for certain skin, esophageal and lung lesions. Not a general light cure; red-light panels are not this.
Heat: hyperthermia ESTABLISHED B (with radiation) Randomized trials in cervical cancer (Dutch Deep Hyperthermia Trial) and sarcoma (EORTC).
BEMER and PEMF mats SPECULATIVE NONE No cancer outcome data of any kind.
Alkaline water and pH SPECULATIVE NONE Bottled alkaline water does not reach the tumor; the research direction (oral bicarbonate) is not the consumer product.
Sound and "frequency" devices SPECULATIVE NONE No outcome data. Rife machines and sound baths have never been trialed.
The ledger

Holistic and repurposed modalities

Same format for every entry, rendered live from the database. What is claimed. What is actually true. What the evidence does not show. Sources with their verification state.

Ketogenic diet

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeC, some B
Claimed

Starving the body of carbohydrate drops blood glucose and insulin, forces normal cells onto ketones, and leaves glucose-dependent tumors short of fuel.

What holds up

Textbook Warburg-effect biology; reproduced across labs.

What it does not show

Pooled trials show reliable metabolic effect (glucose, insulin, IGF-1) and safety; no RCT has shown survival benefit yet. ERGO2 was feasibility, not efficacy.

Evidence for

Voss et al., ERGO2, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020, Kamali et al., umbrella review of systematic reviews, Integr Cancer Ther 2026, Rieger et al., ERGO pilot, Int J Oncol 2014, Diet2Treat phase II, ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources

PENDING Voss et al., ERGO2, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. PENDING Kamali et al., umbrella review of systematic reviews, Integr Cancer Ther 2026. PENDING Rieger et al., ERGO pilot, Int J Oncol 2014. PENDING Diet2Treat phase II, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Carnivore diet

MechanismPLAUSIBLEOutcomeNONE
Claimed

A zero-carbohydrate, all-animal diet produces deeper and more sustained ketosis than keto, with fewer plant compounds to manage.

What holds up

Metabolically a ketogenic diet; shares keto's mechanism.

What it does not show

Zero published cancer studies of carnivore diet exist.

Evidence for

Carnivore Diet: A Scoping Review of the Current Evidence, PMC 2025, Low Carbohydrate Diets in Cancer Therapeutics, PMC 2021

Sources

PENDING Carnivore Diet: A Scoping Review of the Current Evidence, PMC 2025. PENDING Low Carbohydrate Diets in Cancer Therapeutics, PMC 2021.

Glutamine restriction and green tea (EGCG)

MechanismPLAUSIBLEOutcomeNONE
Claimed

Cutting glutamine starves the tumor's second fuel; EGCG from green tea blocks the enzyme glutamate dehydrogenase and so blocks glutamine use.

What holds up

Glutamine addiction is real, a live pharma target; EGCG inhibits glutamate dehydrogenase in cells.

What it does not show

No human trial has shown green tea, EGCG, or dietary glutamine restriction changes a cancer outcome.

Evidence for

Targeting glutamine metabolism as a potential target for cancer treatment, PMC 2025, An alternative mechanism of glutamate dehydrogenase inhibition by EGCG, PMC 2025, Targeting cancer hallmarks with EGCG, PMC 2024

Sources

PENDING Targeting glutamine metabolism as a potential target for cancer treatment, PMC 2025. PENDING An alternative mechanism of glutamate dehydrogenase inhibition by EGCG, PMC 2025. PENDING Targeting cancer hallmarks with EGCG, PMC 2024.

Mebendazole

MechanismPLAUSIBLEOutcomeC
Claimed

The human anti-parasitic cousin of fenbendazole disrupts microtubules in dividing cancer cells and crosses into the brain.

What holds up

Microtubule disruption mechanism, human trials exist unlike most benzimidazoles.

What it does not show

Multiple phase 1/2a trials always added to chemo; built for dose and safety, not to prove benefit.

Evidence for

Gallia et al., Neuro-Oncology Advances 2021;3(1):vdaa154, Kars et al., Cancer Medicine 2020, DOI 10.1002/cam4.3094, Mansoori et al., Scientific Reports 2021, Hegazy et al., Life Sciences 2022 (often miscited as 'Touti'), Nygren and Larsson, Acta Oncologica 2014, a case report, not a trial

Sources

VERIFIED Gallia et al., Neuro-Oncology Advances 2021;3(1):vdaa154. VERIFIED Kars et al., Cancer Medicine 2020, DOI 10.1002/cam4.3094. VERIFIED Mansoori et al., Scientific Reports 2021. VERIFIED Hegazy et al., Life Sciences 2022 (often miscited as 'Touti'). VERIFIED Nygren and Larsson, Acta Oncologica 2014, a case report, not a trial.

Fenbendazole

MechanismPLAUSIBLEOutcomeD
Claimed

A dog dewormer that kills cancer cells through microtubule disruption, p53 and several other pathways, made famous by a rancher's stage 4 lung cancer story.

What holds up

Real mechanism list in cells and mice, cataloged in a 2024 review.

What it does not show

Poor human bioavailability. Famous case was also on trial immunotherapy so cannot be credited to fenbendazole.

Evidence for

Nguyen et al., Anticancer Research 2024;44(9):3725, Yamaguchi et al., Clinical Case Reports 2016

Sources

VERIFIED Nguyen et al., Anticancer Research 2024;44(9):3725. VERIFIED Yamaguchi et al., Clinical Case Reports 2016. RETRACTED 'Stanford Fenbendazole Protocol': no such publication. RETRACTED 'University of Kentucky glioblastoma study': not found.

Ivermectin

MechanismPLAUSIBLEOutcomeD
Claimed

A Nobel-winning anti-parasitic that hits tubulin, mitochondria, p53 and HIF-1 in cancer cells, and, combined with a benzimidazole, 'attacks cancer twenty ways.'

What holds up

Broad preclinical literature across cancer types, including sensitizing lung cancer cells to paclitaxel.

What it does not show

Only human outcome study is uncontrolled, unblinded, self-reported, and authored by the protocol's advocates.

Evidence for

Hulscher, Marik, Makis et al., Anticancer Research 2026;46(6):3243, PMID 42203321, Rockwell et al., JAMA Network Open 2026;9(5):e2616780 (demand study, not efficacy), Sulik et al., Eur J Med Chem Reports 2024, Hayashi et al., Anticancer Research 2024;44(12):5271

Sources

VERIFIED Hulscher, Marik, Makis et al., Anticancer Research 2026;46(6):3243, PMID 42203321. VERIFIED Rockwell et al., JAMA Network Open 2026;9(5):e2616780 (demand study, not efficacy). VERIFIED Sulik et al., Eur J Med Chem Reports 2024. VERIFIED Hayashi et al., Anticancer Research 2024;44(12):5271. VERIFIED Factually / The Conversation evidence review, May 2026.

Tumor treating fields (Optune)

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeA (glioblastoma)
Claimed

Alternating electric fields at a specific frequency, delivered through scalp electrodes, disrupt cell division in tumors.

What holds up

What a 'frequency' therapy looks like when real.

What it does not show

Phase 3 EF-14 RCT showed survival benefit; FDA approved since 2015. Not shown for other gliomas.

Evidence for

Stupp et al., JAMA 2017, EF-14 trial, Real-world meta-analysis, ASCO Daily News summary, Tumor-Treating Fields in Glioblastomas: Past, Present, and Future, PMC 2022

Sources

PENDING Stupp et al., JAMA 2017, EF-14 trial. PENDING Real-world meta-analysis, ASCO Daily News summary. PENDING Tumor-Treating Fields in Glioblastomas: Past, Present, and Future, PMC 2022.

Light: photodynamic therapy

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeA/B (specific cancers)
Claimed

Light can heal tissue and kill cancer.

What holds up

Light-activated drug plus matching-wavelength laser; decades of trials for specific lesions.

What it does not show

Approved for certain skin, esophageal and lung lesions. Not a general light cure; red-light panels are not this.

Evidence for

NCI PDQ summary on photodynamic therapy. Specific trial citations to be added and verified.

Sources

PENDING NCI PDQ summary on photodynamic therapy. Specific trial citations to be added and verified..

Heat: hyperthermia

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeB (with radiation)
Claimed

Heating a tumor to around 40 to 43 degrees Celsius weakens cancer cells and makes radiation and some chemotherapy work better.

What holds up

Tumor brought to measured temperature; standard in some European centers.

What it does not show

Randomized trials in cervical cancer (Dutch Deep Hyperthermia Trial) and sarcoma (EORTC).

Evidence for

van der Zee et al., Lancet 2000, Issels et al., Lancet Oncology 2010 and JAMA Oncology 2018 follow-up

Sources

PENDING van der Zee et al., Lancet 2000. PENDING Issels et al., Lancet Oncology 2010 and JAMA Oncology 2018 follow-up.

BEMER and PEMF mats

MechanismSPECULATIVEOutcomeNONE
Claimed

Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase microcirculation dramatically, flooding the body with oxygen that cancer cannot tolerate.

What holds up

FDA-cleared narrowly for local circulation/muscle stimulation, not cancer; no published 800% figure exists.

What it does not show

No cancer outcome data of any kind.

Evidence for

Independent reviews: Biology Insights, ScienceInsights 2026

Sources

PENDING FDA 510(k) K231368, K210174, K151834 (narrow indication, no cancer claim evaluated). PENDING Independent reviews: Biology Insights, ScienceInsights 2026.

Alkaline water and pH

MechanismSPECULATIVEOutcomeNONE
Claimed

Cancer thrives in acid; alkaline water makes the body inhospitable to it.

What holds up

Tumor microenvironments really are acidic, but blood pH is tightly regulated regardless of what you drink.

What it does not show

Bottled alkaline water does not reach the tumor; the research direction (oral bicarbonate) is not the consumer product.

Evidence for

Tumor alkalization therapy review, Frontiers in Oncology 2024, Plasma-activated water mouse study, Applied Physics Letters 2022 (previously miscited as AIP Advances)

Sources

PENDING Tumor alkalization therapy review, Frontiers in Oncology 2024. VERIFIED Plasma-activated water mouse study, Applied Physics Letters 2022 (previously miscited as AIP Advances).

Sound and "frequency" devices

MechanismSPECULATIVEOutcomeNONE
Claimed

Specific audio or radio frequencies shatter cancer cells the way a note shatters glass.

What holds up

No demonstrated mechanism at the energies involved; contrast with TTFields, a real electric-field therapy.

What it does not show

No outcome data. Rife machines and sound baths have never been trialed.

Evidence for

None on file.

Sources

PENDING Focused ultrasound: to be cited. No supporting literature exists for Rife-type devices to cite..

The standard of care, graded the same way

Conventional care, on the same two axes

Grading conventional care on the same axes as everything else is the only honest way to compare it with anything above.

Surgery

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeA
Claimed

Surgical removal of a solid tumor.

What holds up

The single most effective cancer treatment ever devised.

What it does not show

Curative for most solid tumors caught before spread.

Evidence for

None on file.

Sources

No sources on file yet.

Radiation

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeA
Claimed

Targeted ionizing radiation to kill or control tumor cells.

What holds up

Modern targeted radiation spares far more healthy tissue than older forms.

What it does not show

Curative alone in some cancers; controls recurrence in many others.

Evidence for

None on file.

Sources

No sources on file yet.

Chemotherapy

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeA
Claimed

Systemic cytotoxic drugs targeting rapidly dividing cells.

What holds up

Well characterized cytotoxic and antimetabolite mechanisms.

What it does not show

Curative in testicular cancer, many lymphomas including Hodgkin's, and childhood leukemias; life-extending in many others; brutal in most.

Evidence for

None on file.

Sources

No sources on file yet.

Immunotherapy

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeA
Claimed

Checkpoint inhibitors and related drugs that unleash the immune system against tumors.

What holds up

Checkpoint biology (PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA-4) is well characterized.

What it does not show

Turned some metastatic melanomas and lung cancers from fatal into long-term survivable. Works spectacularly for some, not at all for others.

Evidence for

None on file.

Sources

No sources on file yet.

Targeted therapy

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeA
Claimed

Drugs aimed at a tumor's specific mutation.

What holds up

Mutation-specific drug design, one of the two biggest advances of the last 15 years.

What it does not show

For a patient whose tumor has the matching mutation, often the best option that exists.

Evidence for

None on file.

Sources

No sources on file yet.

Watchful waiting

MechanismESTABLISHEDOutcomeA
Claimed

Active surveillance instead of immediate treatment.

What holds up

Some cancers grow slowly enough that immediate treatment adds risk without benefit.

What it does not show

For some prostate, thyroid and low-grade cancers, doing nothing yet is the evidence-based choice.

Evidence for

None on file.

Sources

No sources on file yet.

How this stays honest

Contribute evidence

Practitioners, researchers, and anyone with a source can submit evidence for or against any claim, or propose a new one. Every submission has a checkable source, discloses conflicts of interest, and is queued for AI-assisted screening and human review before it changes any grade. Nothing is auto-published. Retracted and nonexistent claims stay listed, marked as retracted, so nobody re-adds them. No dosing instructions are accepted.